I had not seen this paper earlier than, by Kevin A. Bryan, right here is the summary:
We assemble a knowledge set of job flyouts for junior economists between 2013 and 2018 to analyze three features of the marketplace for “stars.” First, what’s the background of scholars who turn out to be stars? Second, what sort of analysis does the highest of the market demand? Third, the place do these college students take jobs? Amongst different outcomes, we present that stars usually tend to be worldwide and male than PhDs total, that theoretical and semi-theoretical approaches stay dominant, that American packages each produce probably the most stars and rent much more, that nearly none are employed by the non-public sector, and that there’s a sturdy shift towards having pre-PhD full-time educational analysis jobs.
Is that this excellent news or unhealthy? The paper is attention-grabbing all through, right here is one other bit:
…each People and ladies are practically twice as more likely to have Utilized Micro as a major area in comparison with non-People and males.
As for nation of origin of those star college students, see p.5, I used to be stunned to see Germany rank second after the USA, with Italy and France not far behind, China coming subsequent, then Argentina (!).
Through Soumaya Keynes.