A Case for the Inclusion of Girls in Peace Negotiations


“Why is it that girls ought to bear the burden of proof of displaying that they may make a distinction whereas the person have lengthy been making a complete mess of our safety state of affairs? Once more, the naughty reply will be, ‘Nicely, we don’t even need to make a distinction. Such as you, we have now the proper to be right here. Interval’” (Arnado 2011). Secretary-Basic of the Mindanao Peoples Caucus[1] Mary Ann Arnado’s phrases are concurrently intuitive and in stress with the rhetoric historically used to advertise the inclusion of girls in peace negotiations. The notion that half of a state’s inhabitants ought to have a say within the formative strategy of negotiating for peace would appear intuitive for proponents of political illustration. But, the methods used to realize this illustration recommend a stress. In making the constructive case for girls as peaceable, reasoned, and worthy actors who deserve a spot on the negotiation desk, the case made for the inclusion of girls depends not on what ladies can convey to the desk as folks, however for what they’ll convey of their gendered function as ladies.

This essay will push again in opposition to this essentialist and instrumentalist portrayal of girls to argue for the significance of together with ladies in peace negotiations solely on account of their personhood. That is an argument primarily based on the premise that girls are folks and that folks dwelling in states ought to have a proper to be included in peace processes no matter their gender. To make this case, I’ll first conceptualize and study the character of peace negotiations to show why they’re a course of that’s significantly formative for the character, priorities, and orientation of a state within the sophisticated interval of consolidating peace following a battle and thus, why it’s so essential that girls, as equal stakeholders within the state, ought to have a proper to equal and significant illustration throughout this decisive interval. Secondly, I’ll define and critically assess the literature which advocates for the inclusion of girls on gendered and outcomes-based grounds – as pacifiers, moms, and caretakers – to show why this method is problematic with regard to the long-term political inclusion of girls and the development of gendered behaviour. Lastly, drawing upon post-structuralist theories of gender and political theories of participation, I’ll construct a case for the inclusion of girls which rejects problematic discursive constructions of gender which subordinate ladies and their declare to equal political membership in society. In arguing for a feminist imaginative and prescient of peacebuilding, I search to bridge the logic used to validate the participation of males, whose participation will not be justified by, or contingent upon, the achievement of specific outcomes in the course of the negotiation course of.

Peace Negotiations: a Formative Course of

A central part within the broader peacebuilding course of, peace negotiations are formative areas for the group of post-conflict societies. On this part, I’ll argue for the significance of peace negotiations and situate them within the broader peacebuilding course of; by establishing how influential peace processes will be for the structuring of a state, I argue that the exclusion of girls from these processes is especially dangerous as a result of it denies them the power to stake claims, as equal actors, within the political, financial, social, and ethical orientation of the state.

Earlier than transferring to a dialogue in regards to the nature of peace processes, it’s helpful to make clear what a peace course of is in itself. Darby and Mac Ginty (2000: 6-7) define the sophisticated process of assigning a definition by prefacing that “there is no such thing as a universally agreed definition of a peace course of.” Nonetheless, they recommend 5 options which typically characterize peace processes: protagonists prepared to barter in good religion, the inclusion of key actors, negotiations addressing the central points in dispute, negotiators refraining from the usage of power to realize their targets, and a dedication from all events to a sustained course of. Definitions supplied by the United Nations’ Peacemaker web site (a device for ‘peacebuilding professionals’) adhere to comparable conceptualizations, drawing upon Saunders (2001: 483) who claims they’re “a political course of through which conflicts are resolved by peaceable means” and Sisk (2003) who sees them as step-by-step reciprocal strikes serving to to steadily alternate struggle for peace. Villellas Ariño (2010) means that the thread linking the various definitions of a peace course of is that all of them acknowledge an organized effort to place an finish to armed conflicts by way of dialogue, involving events within the battle, and often with some exterior help. Making use of a extra important feminist lens will discover that these conceptualizations of peace are inadequate; the absence of struggle, for instance, doesn’t equate with the absence of violence – significantly in opposition to ladies in post-conflict contexts (Pearce 2004). Shortcomings apart, when actors interact with the peacebuilding course of, they contemplate themselves to be taking part in some model of the method as outlined above.

The extent to which peace negotiations current a very formative political alternative doesn’t rely completely on the negotiations themselves. The chance they current is available in tandem with the malleable nature of a post-conflict society making ready itself for an period of peace, stability, and prosperity by way of the institution of norms and establishments which are supportive of this process. Realizing how ripe these societies are for change, Alwis et al. (2013) argue that we should always consider peace processes as extra than simply locations the place agreements are negotiated, drafted and signed. With a watch to gender relations, they recommend that these processes can exist as constructive or detrimental areas; they’ll both allow the constructive restructuring of gender relations or they’ll reinforce current inequalities, whereas additionally forcing ladies to forfeit the features they could have made throughout wartime. Information of the facility these peace processes maintain is exactly why ladies throughout cultural contexts, within the International North and South, have mobilized and lobbied for his or her inclusion.

The circumstances of feminine mobilization in Northern Eire by way of the Northern Eire Girls’s Coalition (NIWC) in 1998 and the creation of a ‘Sixth Clan’ to symbolize ladies’s pursuits in Somalia in 2000 are oft-cited examples of this. Within the case of the previous, the institution of the NIWC as a political social gathering based by a Catholic tutorial and a Protestant social employee united ladies throughout sectarian divides and enabled the Coalition to be popularly elected to take part in multi-party peace negotiations. The NIWC’s participation in these negotiations is credited with offering a platform for girls’s political participation, for serving to to “seal a peace deal” in Northern Eire, and for influencing the content material of the 1998 Good Friday Settlement to name for girls’s full and equal political participation (O’Reilly et al. 2015: 14; Alwis et al. 2013: 169). Within the case of the latter, the Sixth Clan acted as a counter to the 5 dominant, male-led clans which Somali society is comprised of. Mobilizing to symbolize ladies’s rights on the 2002 Somali Peace and Reconciliation Convention, the place participation was initially restricted to the 5 clans, the Sixth Clan was in a position to obtain participatory standing and used it to barter for the institution of a Girls’s Ministry and a gender quota for seats within the Transitional Federal Parliament (O’Reilly et al. 2015: 26; Alwis et al. 2013: 169).

In each the lengthy and short-term, negotiations lay the groundwork for the way post-conflict societies shall be structured. Within the short-term, they accomplish that by figuring out how legislation and order shall be restored, how combatants shall be reintegrated, and the way displaced peoples shall be resettled; within the long-term, they account for the devolution of political energy, constitutional modifications, and may have the capability to handle social, political, and financial inequalities. These latter prospects thus make the period of peace negotiations a time of “essential alternative for extra equitable gender relations and energy sharing.” (Alwis et al. 2013: 171). An instance of this consciousness, even predating UNSC Decision 1325, are the 1996 Guatemala Peace Accords which demonstrated an categorical dedication to acknowledging and fixing problems with gender inequality by stipulating the opening of house for girls’s social and political participation alongside improved entry to land, healthcare, credit score, and developmental support. Although they fell brief of their implementation, the Accords show an consciousness amongst events concerning the probabilities offered by the method.

Although a course of in themselves, peace negotiations also needs to be thought of for the function they play inside broader peacebuilding processes which conventionally happen when an armed battle is dropped at an finish. Duncanson (2016) frames peacebuilding because the bold mission of constructing the establishments and infrastructure essential to make peace sustainable; an ethical valuation will be positioned on this mission, relying on whether or not one interprets present peacebuilding mechanisms to be a device of neo-imperialism or altruism. No matter this interpretation, nonetheless, is the truth that peacebuilding mechanisms are deeply gendered and sometimes reiterate gendered energy hierarchies and inequalities by way of the overrepresentation of empowered male actors. If peace negotiations act as an area for these inequalities to be reproduced, then they will also be re-conceptualized as areas whereby these dynamics will be challenged by way of a change in who will get to take part, who’s excluded, and which points are prioritized. Recognizing the best way through which gender (alongside different marginalizing constructions similar to class, sexuality, and ethnicity) influences folks, practices, and insurance policies which affect peace could make it much more necessary for these dynamics to be disrupted with a purpose to allow the significant involvement of stakeholders who’re higher consultant of a post-conflict society.

From a temporal perspective, an consciousness of the best way that gender, as a relational energy dynamic, “underpins and sustains the struggle system” was largely absent in international politics till the implementation of United Nations Safety Council Decision 1325 in 2000. Previous to this recognition, the disproportionate results of conflict-related sexual violence had been nonetheless felt by ladies and went unacknowledged. Even following this recognition and decide to progress, peace processes nonetheless didn’t combine ladies, in accordance with Jenkins and Goetz (2010: 262), as evidenced by the dismal 4% of girls concerned in peace negotiations within the decade following the implementation of 1325 (Fisas 2008: 21). Whereas the inclusion of girls shouldn’t be interpreted as a assure that gender points will abruptly come to the fore, the exclusion of girls is a assure that the gender dynamics current all through the battle (and previous to) will stay “unquestioned and intact” to the detriment of men and women (Alwis et al. 2013: 192). If we settle for that “peace processes symbolize distinctive events […] to behave as the place to begin for extra profound transformative processes” and are incomparable situations for the alteration of structural causes resulting in battle within the first place, then it is going to be necessary to critically assess how to make sure the involvement of girls in a method which ensures their long-term political empowerment as equal, rights-bearing topics (Villellas Ariño 2010: 8).

Girls as Peacemakers: Essentialist and Outcomes-Based mostly Justifications for Inclusion

On account of the data that peace negotiations function such a important juncture in figuring out a nation’s character and priorities following a battle, circumstances have been made to problem the exclusion of girls and to construct a case for his or her inclusion. These circumstances will be separated into two logics: the essentializing logic, which argues for the inclusion of girls given their female nature and the instrumentalist logic, which believes that the inclusion of girls will result in higher outcomes. I’ll assess each to show why they’re antithetical to the targets of gender justice, regardless of being rooted in feminist methods of theorizing about peace and battle. Within the following part, I’ll construct on this important evaluation to make a constructive argument for dismantling gender-based claims to participation in peace processes.

The groundwork wanted to grasp the best way through which ladies are conceptualized on this planet of politics is critically established in Gentry and Sjoberg (2015: 2), who consult with the idealized pictures of femininity which painting ladies as “pure, maternal, emotional, harmless, and peace-loving” actors who, by advantage of being ladies, are “not susceptible to males’s errors, excesses, or violence.” Although these are qualities typically ascribed to ladies throughout cultural contexts, it is very important situate this characterization of girls as one which particularly frames their involvement in international politics. That is the characterization that operates throughout the binary which makes use of masculinity to border struggle, whereas framing peace as a female mission related to passivity, domesticity, tranquility, softness, compromise, and interdependence. In these phrases, peace is framed as a “‘being’ fairly than a ‘doing’” and “an absence fairly than a presence” and this passive understanding of peace is what permits it to be fairly conceived of as a feminine mission (Cohn 2013: 12). The notion that there’s an innate feminine disposition to be peaceable ought to permit ladies to make a grounded declare for participation in peace processes, lending itself to what Sperling (2006: 114) refers to as “gender-based claims that girls and moms are incapable of committing homicide” and thus, ought to make superb peacemakers. This logic, whose origins lie in efforts made by way of feminist principle to increase the significant involvement of girls in peace processes, will not be confined to the self-discipline of its origins. It’s compelling sufficient for use within the building of wider-reaching narratives in political science, such because the one posited by Fukuyama (1998: 34), the place he acknowledges the contributions of feminist political principle in enabling his declare that the inclusion of girls in politics would make the world a greater place by way of “[controlling] the violent and aggressive tendencies of males”. Girls, in any case, are distinctive of their capacity to provide start and mom kids which allows them to assume in a different way and extra peacefully about find out how to resolve worldwide political tensions. In tangible phrases, he considers this “feminization of world politics” to be the controlling of male impulses by way of female and peaceable methods of conducting politics, be it by way of the creation of norms, legal guidelines, agreements, or contracts (Fukuyama 1998: 34). Deploying this ‘maternal’ logic to assemble ladies conceives of them as moms and wives first, and as folks (divorced from any specific ethical orientation) second. In different phrases, theorists who make the case for feminine involvement make their case on the grounds that feminine decision-making is distinct from male decision-making as a result of it’s pushed by maternal logic, versus nuanced or politicized reasoning.

Spinoff of this characterization of girls, which essentializes a whole gender as naturally inclined to peace and compromise, is the instrumentalist logic: that involving ladies in peace negotiations will result in higher outcomes. Although it may be argued that considering of girls in instrumentalist phrases is reductive, advocates for the inclusion of girls in peacebuilding processes argue that girls ought to strategically harness this notion of their nature to realize a seat on the desk. By having a seat on the desk, ladies will be capable to place objects on the negotiation agenda which are usually uncared for by males; it implies that they’ll advocate for sustainable, community-based peace initiatives and may make sure that gender-based points (i.e. sexual violence) are adequately addressed. In having the choice to make this strategic concession lies the dilemma of feminist approaches to peacebuilding; as Duncanson (2016: 54) places it: “if we mobilize as ladies for change, can we cement the very id – and the thought of mounted identities – that we have now recognized as a part of the issue?”. Whereas males exist in an area the place their involvement in peace negotiations will not be contingent on assuring {that a} specific consequence is delivered, the hostility ladies have confronted when looking for a spot on the negotiation desk requires them to show their worth as peacemakers in instrumentalist phrases.

A regular argument made to justify the exclusion of girls is that they don’t play a job within the battle or within the pre-conflict political processes of the nation. This argument was made in the course of the 2002 Democratic Republic of the Congo peace talks, when the Congolese authorities and different opponents sought to maintain ladies out of the negotiation course of, insisting that “struggle and peace are completely the enterprise of males” (Mpoumou 2004: 122). An assault on the workplaces of the Réseau des Femmes pour la Protection des Droits et la Paix[2] by a insurgent group was a bodily assertion of this logic. Girls have additionally been stored out of peace talks by male negotiators who insist that their pursuits will be represented with out their participation. Following the ‘tenuous’ inclusion of girls within the 1998 Arusha III peace talks, Burundian negotiators “categorically [refused]” the inclusion of girls in Burundi’s 2000 spherical of peace negotiations. They insisted that male negotiators had been outfitted to symbolize ladies’s pursuits and that girls had must go residence to take care of their kids (Puechguirbal 2005: 5-6).

When confronted with this stage of basic gender-based opposition, it’s cheap to deduce that making a counterclaim, additionally on gendered grounds, looks as if the one method to legitimately problem exclusionary logics; by doing so, ladies can show how and why they create distinctive worth to peace processes. In making this case for his or her involvement, ladies should be capable to distinguish their contributions from what males are historically in a position to convey to peace negotiations. Alwis et al. (2013: 175) describe this as strategically utilizing patriarchal assumptions to convey an finish to violence, to realize ethical authority, and to safe inclusion in peace processes. These assumptions embrace the notion peddled by Boru Raba, chief of the Ethiopian Peace Committee of Elders, who acknowledged that “ladies are higher than males” as a result of they’ll “play each a fueling function and a cooling function” – which means they’ll intervene to make males change their minds (McCabe 2007). Duncanson (2016: 12) agrees that this framing will be turned on its head to enhance the illustration of girls in peace processes, which is beneficial granted that “ladies have many insights and a formidable monitor file in working for peace” however she questions if it must be.

There are a variety of causes to be skeptical about this hyperlink between the involvement of girls and the reassurance of profitable outcomes, 4 of that are of specific relevance. Firstly, the affiliation of girls as guarantors of peace can forestall each ladies and peace from being taken severely within the realm of the political. Secondly, this affiliation can be utilized to justify the exclusion of girls from public roles in politics past the realm of peace activism. Enloe (2002: 23) argues that this characterization of feminine enhances to militarized masculinity within the time of peacebuilding allows the “[exclusion of] ladies from full and assertive participation in postwar public life.”  Thirdly, assigning ladies as the first actors driving the peace mission can exclude males from fulfilling peaceable roles; on this respect, the feminization of peace reinforces the masculinity of struggle, and thus reinforces a binary of political motion which is strictly gendered. Fourthly, Inglehart and Norris (2003) posit that working inside these idealized notions of femininity will entice ladies into idealized roles primarily based on their gender, thus threatening ‘the rising tide of gender equality’ by denying ladies (and by extension, males) the chance to current themselves as advanced and multifaceted political actors who’re pushed by motivations which prolong past their gender. Girls additionally exist as members of nationwide, non secular, racial, and socio-economic teams who will be pushed by political agendas that exist in separation from, or in opposition to, notions of gender justice. 

In making the participation of girls contingent on their capacity to embody their gendered function as actors for peace and to ship profitable outcomes, the last word hazard ladies can befall is failure to realize these outcomes or fulfill these roles. If ladies are given a spot on the desk on the assure that they’ll ‘safe the peace’, and if they’re unsuccessful in doing so, which means that they’ve failed as each ladies and as peace negotiators. Consequently, the already troublesome process of securing ladies’s political participation is made much more troublesome.

Deconstructing ‘the Lady’: an Equal Declare to Personhood and Peace-Constructing

If essentially the most superb case for feminine participation in peace negotiations doesn’t come from the important nature of girls or the outcomes that they’re able to assure, then the query stays: is it necessary for girls to be included in peace negotiations? On this part, I’ll make a constructive argument for the inclusion of girls in peace negotiations and broader peace processes. This argument depends on the premise that girls shouldn’t need to make their declare to participation on any grounds past these which stipulate that they’re equal members of their societies and thus, have a proper to be included within the peacebuilding course of. Situating this premise inside theories of broader political illustration, I draw upon Phillips’ (1995) argument that no group ought to have the inherent proper to monopolize political workplace and Cohn’s (2013) contextually particular argument that girls ought to take part in peace processes, not as a result of they’re innately peaceable or as a result of they’ve been victimized by wars, however as a result of they’re political topics with rights. To train these rights, they needn’t be higher or extra peaceable than males. In a perfect world, the perfect observe of inclusion wouldn’t be contingent on fulfilling constructed gender roles; which means that ladies may contend for a spot as mediocre actors and males may make claims for his or her participation as ‘peaceable’ actors.

As a way to first reject the belief that “ladies are naturally extra peaceable than males” or that girls are specific victims of struggle, we should look additional into the development of gender itself. Butler’s (1990) post-structural method to serious about feminism posits that we should always abandon a ‘mounted’ understanding of gender so as to consider gender as a malleable web site of social regulation the place relations of energy are reproduced. If gender is certainly ‘fluid’ and never ‘mounted’, then it can’t be taken without any consideration that every one ladies are innately extra peaceable than all males. In different phrases, the notion that folks share traits as a result of they belong to the group ‘man’ or ‘girl’ must be deserted. Butler’s (1993: 70) case for abandoning this notion extends past recognizing the bogus nature of gender constructions to account for detrimental energy dynamics, provided that these ‘mounted’ methods of serious about ladies reiterate ‘hegemonic norms’ whereby gendered hierarchies are created and reproduced by gendered social energy. Despite these discourses being synthetic and intersubjective social constructions, as Peterson (1999: 35-64) suggests, this isn’t to say that they don’t maintain actual energy in “[regulating] international politics: in interstate relations, worldwide growth, and worldwide safety” (Sjoberg and Gentry 2015: 5). In harnessing their discursive energy, Sjoberg and Gentry (2015: 8) contend that these constructions contribute to the preservation of “discursive constructions of gender subordination” which idealize the attributes of “sex-assumed males.” It is very important acknowledge the structural affect of those constructions if we’re to contemplate gender parity to be an easy matter of simply political illustration; as Phillips (1995: 63) argues, it’s “patently and grotesquely unfair for males to monopolize illustration” and their current capability to take action is proof of intentional or structural discrimination on gendered grounds.

A feminist case for the inclusion of girls in peace processes thus must critically analyze manifestations of gender in international politics. The reasoning for that is threefold. Firstly, its objective must be to undo the constraints positioned on ladies’s decision-making energy, which presently confines them to choices about their femininity and maternity. Secondly, a feminist case ought to broaden the political company of girls past what their “womanly instincts” and “use-value” allow (Otto 2006: 139). Lastly, it ought to create a conception of girls as critical “political gamers” in opposition to their standard portrayal as “passive victims in want of safety” (El-Bushra 2007: 140; Tickner 1992: 59).

If these are the targets of a feminist imaginative and prescient for feminine inclusion in peacebuilding, then a important evaluation of gender dynamics ought to search to perform materials and normative progress; the previous being understood when it comes to how standing and assets are allotted to help the presence of girls in peace negotiations and the latter being achieved with the dismantling of the current normative valuation which locations ‘masculine struggle’ above ‘female peace’. These targets must be achieved not solely for the sake of girls, however for the sake of our broader humanity; the current affiliation of girls with peace, whether or not it’s to empower their participation or justify their exclusion, is detrimental to males as a result of it “[serves] because the collective projection of a pure and peaceable Different in opposition to which a violent male is constructed” (Elshtain 1982: 342). Acknowledging the artificiality of this building and undoing it thus allows males to be brokers for pacification in the event that they so want. For proponents of peace and battle decision, the elimination of an innate affiliation between masculinity and struggle ought to present much less incentive for males to really feel inclined to change into brokers of violence.

Finally, the feminist case for feminine participation must be made on grounds that will seem like deceptively easy. In spite of everything, ladies are folks they usually represent an approximate half of the inhabitants; if the populace is entitled to a set of rights as political topics, then ladies must be entitled to those rights no matter how good or how peaceable they’re as people. Assigning group traits, primarily based on ‘mounted’ constructions of gender limits the scope inside which ladies can act as political actors. In spite of everything, feminine actions don’t essentially derive from a politics of gender; race, faith, class, and nationality are different political pursuits that may orient the judgement of girls when they’re sitting on the negotiation desk. Granting ladies the proper to symbolize these pursuits doesn’t imply validating the pursuits themselves; fairly, the proper of illustration means giving ladies the proper to make their case in the identical method that males have traditionally been in a position to. Advocating for this proper stems from the “very core of feminism” which holds “the conviction that girls matter for their very own sakes” and never for any distinctive affect they’ll have, or for any worthwhile function they’ll play (Enloe 2013: 15). When given this proper, ladies can harness it to push ‘ladies’s points’ or they’ll use it to drive different political agendas, which will be critiqued on political grounds. The case of Edita Tahiri, Overseas Minister of different Kosovan political establishments between 1991 and 2001 and the only feminine negotiator on the Rambouillet Peace Convention with Serbia in 1999, speaks to the function ladies ought to be capable to play in peace negotiations. Tahiri has since brazenly mirrored on her function within the Convention as one which was deeply pushed by an Albanian nationalist agenda and paid no regard to gender points. Given one other alternative, Tahiri says that she would now be extra gender-aware, however this doesn’t low cost that her largely nationalist motivations in 1999 are demonstrative of the function ladies ought to be capable to play: as political actors divorced from expectations of their gender (Villellas Ariño and Morena 2008: 18-19).

The conundrum, nonetheless, stays unsolved. A feminist imaginative and prescient of peace will be conceived of in two irreconcilable methods: is feminist peace that which creates situations for the protection and safety of all ladies? Or does it permit for multitudes of feminine views to be heard, on equal footing with male views, no matter what the implications could also be for different segments of girls in society? By drawing upon post-structuralist theories of gender, this part has sought to make a case for the latter imaginative and prescient of peace – which is exclusive in recognizing the complexities of feminine views and in granting the company wanted for these views to be represented – on the negotiation desk, in broader peace processes, and in political techniques at giant.


Peace negotiations function formative processes which have the capability to orient the priorities of a state because it navigates the challenges of creating norms and establishments in a post-conflict context. The exclusion of girls from this course of serves not solely to decrease the illustration of points regarding gender, however extra critically, this exclusion denies ladies the chance to take part within the strategy of state re-formation as equal political actors who’ve a official declare to participation by advantage of their personhood as rights-bearing topics. As a way to make the case for girls’s inclusion, feminist theorists have prompt that girls have important qualities and/or a novel capability to make sure that peace negotiations result in superb outcomes. Although each arguments are rooted within the ‘good’ intention of selling ladies’s political participation, they’re finally counterproductive as a result of they perpetuate constructions of gender which serve to disempower ladies and undermine peace processes.

As an alternative, this essay has argued for a post-structuralist understanding of gender which eschews a hard and fast notion of gender for one which is fluid. This understanding of gender acknowledges that girls are particular person beings with particular person beliefs which might orient them in the direction of peace and gender points – or away from these concerns. Merely sharing the group id of ‘girl’ doesn’t, and shouldn’t, function an assurance that girls will symbolize gender points; racial, non secular, and class-based cleavages can supersede gendered concerns for girls – as they do for males. In a perfect world and working throughout the framework of a perfect feminism, ladies could have the chance to take part in peace negotiations as political actors, even when their contributions are counterproductive to the mission of peace. If a feminist imaginative and prescient of peace is about making certain the involvement of girls in the course of the peacebuilding course of to make sure their long-term political participation, then that is the one method. Males have been afforded this proper and have monopolized it for a lot too lengthy.


Alwis, M., Mertus, J., and Sajjad, T. 2013. Girls and Peace Processes. In Carol Cohn (ed.) Girls and Wars. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Arnado, M.A., 2011. ‘A Victory for Girls, A Motive to Have fun’. Isis Worldwide: we! e-Publication. http://www.isiswomen.org/index.php?choice=com_content&view=article&id=1456:a-victory-for-women-a-reason-to-celebrate&catid=20:intermovements&Itemid=231.

Butler, J. 1993. Our bodies that Matter: On the Discursive Limits of Intercourse. New York: Routledge.

Butler, J. 1990. Gender Hassle: Feminism and the Subversion of Identification. London: Routledge.

Cohn, C. 2013. Girls and Wars: Towards a Conceptual Framework. In Carol Cohn (ed.) Girls and Wars. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Darby, J. and Mac Ginty, R. 2000. The administration of peace processes. Basingstoke: Macmillan.

Duncanson, C. 2016. Gender & Peacebuilding. Cambridge: Polity Press.

El-Bushra, J. 2007. ‘Feminism, Gender and Girls’s Peace Activism’. Improvement and Change 38 (1): 131-47.

Elshtain, J.B. 1982. ‘On Lovely Souls, Simply Warriors, and Feminist Consciousness’. Girls’s Research Worldwide Discussion board 5 (3/4): 341-8.

Enloe, C. 2002. Demilitarization – Or Extra of the Similar? Feminist Inquiries to Ask within the Submit-war Second. In Cynthia Cockburn and Dubravka Zarkov (eds.), The Submit Conflict Second: Militaries, Masculinities and Worldwide Peacekeeping. London: Lawrence & Wishart.

Enloe, C. 2013. Significantly!: Investigating Crashes and Crises as if Girls Mattered. Berkeley: College of California Press.

Fisas Armengol, V. 2008. 2008 Yearbook on Peace Processes. Barcelona: Icaria Editorial.

Fukuyama, F. 1998. ‘Girls and the Evolution of World Politics’. Overseas Affairs 77 (5): 24-40.

Gentry, C. and Sjoberg, L. 2015. Past Moms, Monsters, Whores: Excited about Girls’s Violence in International Politics. London: Zed Books.

Inglehart, R. and Norris, P. 2003. Rising Tide: Gender Equality and Cultural Change around the World. Cambridge: Cambridge College Press.

Jenkins, R. and Goetz, A.M. 2010. ‘Addressing Sexual Violence in Internationally Mediated Peace Negotiations’. Worldwide Peacekeeping 17 (2): 261-77.

McCabe, C. 2007. “Ethiopian Girls Rediscover Function as Peace Builders.” Oxfam Worldwide. https://www.oxfamamerica.org/discover/tales/ethiopian-women-rediscover-role-as-peace-builders.

Mpoumou, D. 2004. Girls’s Participation in Peace Negotiations: Discourse within the Democratic Republic of the Congo. In Julie Ballington (ed.), The Implementation of Quotas: African Experiences. Stockholm: Worldwide Institute for Democracy and Electoral Help.

O’Reilly, M., Ó Súilleabháin, A., and Paffenholz, T. 2015. Reimagining Peacemaking: Girls’s Roles in Peace Processes. New York: Worldwide Peace Institute.

Otto, D. 2006. ‘A Signal of Weak spot: Disrupting Gender Certainties within the Implementation of Safety Council Decision 1325’. Michigan Journal of Gender and Regulation 13 (1): 113-76.

Pearce, J. 2004. Sustainable peace constructing within the South: experiences from Latin America. In Haleh Afshar and Deborah Eade (eds.), Improvement, ladies, and struggle: feminist views. Oxford: Oxfam GB.

Peterson, V.S. 1999. ‘Sexing political identities/nationalism as heterosexism’. Worldwide Feminist Journal of Politics 1 (1): 35-64.

Phillips, A. 1995. The Politics of Presence: The Political Illustration of Gender, Ethnicity, and Race. New York: Oxford College Press.

Puechguirbal, N. 2005. Gender and Peace Constructing in Africa: Some Evaluation of Structural Obstacles. In Dina Rodriguez and Edith Natukunda-Togboa (eds.), Gender and Peace Constructing in Africa. San Jose, Costa Rica: College for Peace.

Saunders, H. 2001. Prenegotiation and Circum-negotiation: Arenas of the Multilevel Peace Course of. In Chester A. Croker, Fen Osler Hampson, and Pamela Aall (eds.), Turbulent Peace: The Challenges of Managing Worldwide Battle. Washington D.C.: United States Institute of Peace Press.

Sisk, T. D. 2003. ‘Energy Sharing’. In Man Burgess and Heidi Burgess (eds.), Past Intractability. Boulder: Battle Data Consortium, College of Colorado.

Sperling, C. 2006. ‘Mom of all atrocities: Pauline Nyiramusuhuko’s function within the Rwandan genocide’. Fordham City Regulation Journal 33 (2): 101-127.

Tickner, J. 1992. Gender in Worldwide Relations: Feminist Views on Attaining International Safety. New York: Columbia College Press.

Villellas Ariño, A. and Morena, G. 2008. An Strategy to the Kosovo Submit-Conflict Rehabilitation Course of from a Gender Perspective. Barcelona: Escola de Cultura de Pau 2.

Villellas Ariño, M. 2010. The Participation of Girls in Peace Processes. The Different Tables. Barcelona: Institut Catalã Internacional.


[1] The Mindanao Peoples Caucus is a grassroots community of communities and leaders within the Philippines who’ve a typical imaginative and prescient of reaching peace in Mindanao by way of casual negotiations.

[2] A ladies’s group mobilizing to ship representatives to the peace talks

Written at: Trinity School, College of Cambridge
Written for: Dr. Devon Curtis
Date written: April 2020

Additional Studying on E-Worldwide Relations

Supply hyperlink


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here